The News
CData Software’s new report, The State of AI Data Connectivity: 2026 Outlook, finds that only 6% of enterprise AI leaders believe their data infrastructure is ready for AI, revealing a widening readiness gap that is now a primary barrier to AI maturity. The study surveyed more than 200 AI and data leaders across enterprises and software providers, uncovering direct correlations between data infrastructure maturity, AI outcomes, and competitiveness. To read more, visit the original report here.
Analysis
AI Ambition Collides with Data Reality
Across the industry, AI deployments are accelerating faster than organizations can modernize the underlying data infrastructure required to support them. In many cases, model development is no longer the bottleneck, data connectivity, context, quality, and governance are.
This aligns strongly with theCUBE Research and ECI’s findings across Day 0–2 surveys, where AI/ML investment is the No. 1 spending priority for 70.4% of organizations, yet foundational platform challenges persist:
- 50.7% cite limited tooling and budget constraints as top security and config challenges,
- 53.1% cite integration issues in API lifecycle management, and
- 59.4% of enterprises say automation and AIOps are their most critical lever for improving operations.
These operational frictions reflect the same infrastructure bottlenecks highlighted in the CData study. AI performance is directly tied to an organization’s ability to connect, contextualize, and control data across its system landscape.
A Shift From Models to Infrastructure
The report draws a clear line between AI maturity and data infrastructure maturity:
- 60% of high-AI-maturity organizations have invested deeply in modern data infrastructure,
- 53% of low-maturity organizations cite immature data systems as their primary blocker, and
- 100% of respondents agree real-time data is essential for AI agents, yet 20% still lack real-time capabilities.
This marks a strategic turning point in the market. AI models are becoming commoditized, while connectivity, semantic consistency, and context-rich data access are emerging as the true differentiators.
This echoes our research on agentic application development, where reliable access to contextual, real-time data is a foundational requirement for safe and predictable autonomous agent behavior. AI systems cannot reason or act intelligently if they cannot understand the systems they interact with.
Why These Problems Persist
Developers and platform teams continue to face several systemic constraints:
- Data plumbing is overwhelming innovation: 71% of AI teams spend over a quarter of their time dealing with data movement, integration, and harmonization instead of building models or deploying features.
- Connectivity complexity is accelerating: Nearly half of organizations now require real-time access to six or more systems for a single AI use case.
- AI-native providers face 3x the integration load of traditional SaaS, reflecting a new class of software built around continuous, dynamic data flows rather than static pipelines.
- Semantic drift across systems remains unsolved: High performers centralize and standardize business logic, but 80% of low-maturity orgs haven’t started.
These findings reinforce a consistent theme across the industry; as cloud-native architectures scale, operational complexity is outpacing the maturity of integration and data governance layers and making AI harder, slower, and riskier to operationalize.
How Developers May Change Their Approach
Developers may increasingly look toward architectural strategies that reduce manual integration effort and foreground semantic consistency. While each organization’s approach will vary, the findings suggest several directional shifts:
- More investment in centralized data access layers to avoid repetitive, ad hoc integrations.
- Greater focus on real-time pipelines to support AI agents that require up-to-date operational state.
- Adoption of semantic metadata layers so that AI systems can understand business entities and relationships rather than relying on brittle mappings.
- Movement toward managed connectivity services that reduce data plumbing time and free developers to focus on higher-value logic.
- Stronger alignment between data, platform, and application teams, in response to the rising complexity of multi-system AI workflows.
As developers continue adopting AI-native patterns, the pressure to modernize data infrastructure will likely intensify.
Looking Ahead
Data Infrastructure as the Core AI Constraint
Industry-wide, organizations appear to be shifting from “model-driven AI strategy” to “infrastructure-first AI strategy.” This echoes the direction seen in other ecosystem research; the winners in enterprise AI will be those who build connected, context-rich, real-time data layers that allow agents and models to operate reliably.
What This Means for CData
As one of the few companies explicitly addressing AI data connectivity as a platform category, CData is positioned to benefit from this shift. The report’s findings reinforce market momentum toward centralized, semantically governed data access, which are areas CData has invested through MCP-native platforms and context-aware connectors. Future moves may include deeper semantic modeling, expanded real-time capabilities, additional AI-native integration tooling, and broader adoption of MCP-based patterns across enterprises and software providers.
Architectural Modernization Meets AI-Assisted Development
New CData Study Reveals Only 6% of AI Leaders Are Truly Infrastructure-Ready
NVIDIA’s MLPerf Training v5.1 Dominance Reinforces Market Leadership
Pythagora’s Secure Spaces Addresses Real AI-Generated Tool Security Challenges
AMD’s $1 Trillion Compute Market Ambitions Face NVIDIA Dominance, ROCm Maturity Gaps, and Unvalidated Performance Claims
